![]() |
![]() |
![]() British Naval Heritage in Micronesia:
|
Occasionally, however, a single coast defense gun emplacement can be found, such as at the southern tip of Mile Island. The emplacements were standardised and the lay-out of the battery was the same all over. The schematic lay-out of such a battery is shown in figure 5.
A completely developed coastal defense gun battery comprises of the following entities (reference is made features on figure 5): A group of three six inch coastal defense guns in their emplacements (8) are set in a row along the water's edge, flanked by two medium anti-aircraft guns (75 or 80mm) in their emplacement (7). The anti-aircraft defense is further strengthened by three heavy machine gun emplacements (9). A heavy machine gun or medium anti-aircraft battery consisting of four emplacements is set to the rear of the ammunitions building and the command centre (13). The fire control center (6) and an auxiliary building, possibly serving as a generator building (5) are set to the rear of the central coastal defense gun emplacement. The ammunition building (4), set in a strong earth revetment is set further to the rear, and is connected to the gun emplacements by access roads (10) and by narrow gauge railroad tracks (16). The latter is being used to haul the 100lb heavy shells to the gun emplacements.
The barracks building for the gun crews (1) is set to one side, together with a bath (2) and a toilet building (3). The coastal defense gun battery is defended against attacks from the seaward side by barbed wire entanglement and obstacles for beach defense (11) set onto the beachrock outcrops and the coral reef platform. A personnel trench to guard against landings has also been dug (13). Against attacks from the landward side, an angular, slotted personnel trench (12) has been dug, which is strengthened by a series of heavy machine gun emplacements (14).
The ground defenses vary from gun battery to gun battery. In many cases there are additional, personnel trenches of short length and additional light and medium machine gun emplacements.
The assessment of bombing effects showed that in many cases a revetment could sustain several direct bomb hits without breaking its inner wall or putting the gun out of the operational category. A study on the efficiency of the bombing by dive-bombing SBD-5's found that the gun emplacements would stand out well as long as they had not been the focus of bombing raids. Once they had been bombed severely, the round bomb-craters with their surrounding wall of soil could easily be mistaken for the gun-emplacements (U.S. Marine Corps 1944i).
Figure 6 Standard 150mm gun emplacement.
The range finder is also known to have been erected on loosely concreted coral boulder mounds, as on Kwajalein (JICPOA 1945c:36) or on wooden constructions, made of coconut logs, as on Makin, Kiribati (JICPOA 1945c:37) During the time of the operations several range finders were apparently set on small observation towers erected from coconut logs. These could easily be destroyed even by near-misses and no traces of such structures have survived. See for example the toppled range finder position of the southern 140mm gun battery formerly erected on coconut logs (USSBS 1947a:247 photo 8).
A
narrow gauge railroad, the most ubiquitous remains of which are the axles of
the railroad carts, serviced the gun emplacements with the heavy shells from
the magazine. As far as can be ascertained, the ammunition railroad used only
hand driven carts and no locomotives.
CREW
The six inch guns were operated by a crew of nine men under the command of a
gunnery officer of the IJN, commonly with the rank of a lieutenant. For
servicing a battery of three guns 63 men were needed (CINPAC-CINCPOA 1945a:54).
The crew would sleep in a barracks building to the rear of the battery in one
of various standard-type barracks buildings (see Denfeld 1979; Look &
Spennemann 1992 for illustrations).
Barracks
The crew were housed in a barracks building close to the gun emplacements.
These barracks buildings existed in a variety of combinations of internal lay
out, depending on function. All buildings had in common an elevated floor set
on concrete support posts, wide eaves with a covered verandah, and large open
windows to allow for breeze and fresh air.
[Next] [Back to Contents]
Bibliographic citation for this document
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (2000). British Naval Heritage in Micronesia: Tangible evidence of the armament trade from 1890 to 1937. Albury:
URL: http:/marshall.csu.edu.au/Marshalls/html/UKNaval/UKNaval.html
CONTACT:
Dirk H.R. Spennemann,
Institute of Land, Water and Society,
Charles Sturt University, P.O.Box 789,
Albury NSW 2640, Australia.
e-mail: dspennemann@csu.edu.au
select from the following... | ||||||
|
||||||
Digital Micronesia-An
Electronic
Library & Archive
is provided free of charge
as an advertising-free
information service
for the world community. It is being maintained by Dirk
HR Spennemann, Associate
Professor in Cultural
Heritage Management, Institute of Land, Water and Society and School
of Environmental & Information Sciences, Charles
Sturt University,
Albury, Australia. The server
space and technical support are provided by Charles
Sturt University as part of its commitment
to regional engagement. Environmental
SciencesInformation
Sciences
|
||||||