The wreck of the Libelle and other early European Visitors to Wake Island, Central Pacific
by Dirk H.R. Spennemann
Many of the small and isolated atolls in the Central Pacific Ocean were bypassed by human settlement and development. On occasions voyagers from nearby island groups went to them, but only for comparatively brief periods of time. These atolls were in climatic zones that produced little reliable rainfall and were too small to develop a ground water lens of sufficient size and depth to sustain a human population or to allow even the growth of coconut palms. As a result the vegetation cover was also very sparse and the soil undeveloped. Atolls such as these were of little interest to both Micronesians and the European navigators who happened to stumble upon them on their voyages. Such is the case of Wake Atoll in the Central Pacific. Yet the isolation meant that if and when people were stranded there by accident, their stay on the atoll was bound to be a very trying one.
Oral traditions claim that the Marshallese Knew of Wake Atoll prior to contact with European navigators. The Marshallese name for the atoll was Eneen-Kio or Ane-en Kio, "Island of the kio flower".  The atoll was a source of feathers and plumes of seabirds. Prized were the wing bones of albatross, from which tattooing chisels could be made.  In addition, the rare kio flower grew on the atoll. Bringing these items to the home atolls implied that the navigators had been able to complete the feat of finding the atoll using traditional navigation skills of stars, wave patterns and other ocean markers.
Like the Marshallese visits to the atolls of Bikar and Bokak, the voyages to Wake occurred once a year or even less frequently. It is thus not surprising that none of the Europeans visiting or landing on Eneen-Kio mention the presence of Marshallese or any signs of permanent or temporary human habitation on this atoll.
Later Spanish and English maps  show two islands in the latitude and approximate vicinity of Wake, named Lamira (take care) and Discierta (desert). It has been advanced by some authors that these names and the absence of other land within several hundred miles suggest that each may represent an independent (Spanish) discovery of Wake.  Given the number of Spanish vessels plying the waters, this is quite feasible.
The discovery of Wake Atoll by Captain Wake in the Prince William Henry is, however, disputed by Ward.  The Boston Gazette of 18 September 1797 carried an item by a Joseph Pierpont, traveller on the Prince William Henry, who mentions that they discovered a coral reef and two sand islands at 16deg.45'N 169deg.38 W. When discussing the newspaper story, Ward argues that the coral reefs discovered by Wake are those of Johnston Atoll (16deg.53'N, 169deg.31'W), as the co-ordinates given in the newspaper do not even remotely tally with those of Wake Atoll (19deg.18'N 166deg.38'E). 
The habit of exchanging even hearsay data as fact resulted in considerable chart confusion, and Wake suffered with the other islands. By 1828, besides being variously located, it carried a number of names: Douglas Island, Halcyon Island, Helsion Island, Haystrous Island, Halverd Island, Wake's Island, Waker's Island, Weeks Island, Wilson Island, Wreck Island. For reasons unclear it its also named "Eceuil" on French charts. 
This inaccuracy posed navigational dangers to the unwary captains. Amasa Delano, in the Perseverance in September 1806 reiterated a common sentiment:
"There are several islets and rock, which lie directly in the track of vessels bound from the Sandwich Islands [Hawaii] to Canton [in China], that are dangerous if fallen in with the night, two of which were discovered by captain Wake and are called Wake's Island and Rocks. I did not fall in with them" 
In a similar vein, Captain Sproule, in the barque Maria in 1858 commented that:
"At 5 P.M. the lookout on the foretop-gallant yard saw low land on the starboard bow. I went aloft and saw from the topsail yard a very low island, rather higher in the centre than at the ends, and covered with low bushes. It was dark before we approached it sufficiently near to make observations, but I am confident that would not be seen more than five miles off deck by daylight and in a dark night never in time to avoid it". 
As mentioned earlier Halcyon is likely to be identical with Wake. In addition, a Helicons island was reported to be at 22deg.28'N 177deg.05'E (U.S.Congress 1835, p. 25). During his exploring expedition, Wilkes also searched for "Maloon's Island" reported to be in position 19deg.20'N 165deg.20'W, and for another island, reported to be in position 19deg.17'N 166deg.48'E both of which he could not locate.  It is possible, given the general similarity of the positions with these of Wake, that these islands were incorrectly reported independent discoveries of Wake.
Table 1. Co-ordinates that have been reported for Wake Atoll. The position given in the Pacific Islands Pilot of 1956 is shown in bold.
|16°49'N 169°40'W||as Week's Reef; U.S.Congress 1835|
|16°49'N 169°40'W||U.S.Congress 1835|
|17°48'N 186°12'W [=173°48'E]||Wake's Rocks; Delano, quoted after Dickson 1939|
|19°00'N 193°12'W [=166°48'E]||Wake's Island; Delano, quoted after Dickson 1939|
|19°06'N 163°33'E||Halycon I., U.S. Congress 1835|
|19°10'54"N 166°31'30"E||Wilkes 1845; Findlay 1886|
|19°10'N 166°23'E||Hunneywell 1824; 29 December 1824|
|19°10'N 166°48'E||Riddell 1854; 7 March 1853|
|19°11'N 166°31'E||Kaucher 1941:124; The Friend (Honolulu) 1 Sept 1866|
|19°14'N 166°30'E||Logbook U.S.S. Beaver 19 June 1921|
|19°15'N 166°28'E||Logbook U.S.S. Newport News 30 October 1920|
|19°15'N 166°30'E||Wilkes 1840; Brigham 1900|
|19°15'N 166°32'E||Gardner (Bellona) in U.S.Congress 1835|
|19°15'N 166°33'E||S.S.China, Anonymous 1898d|
|19°16'N 166°37'E||Hobbs 1945|
|19°17'N 166°37'E||Pacific Islands Pilot 1956|
|19°17'N 166°48'E||unnamed island unsuccessfully searched for by Wilkes 1845|
|19°18'40"N 166°35'20"E||U.S.S.Nitro 1935 H.O.Chart No. 162|
|19°19'N 166°39'E||mean of positions; Anonymous 1898c|
|19°20'N 165°20'W (E ?)||Maloon's Island unsuccessfully searched for by Wilkes 1845|
|19°20'N 166°50'E||U.S.Congress 1835, p. 33|
|19°21'N 166°55'E||Week's or Wilson's I. U.S.Congress 1835|
|19°23'N 165°33'E||'Halcyon I., acc. to a US captain, quoted in Kotzebue 1830|
|19°23'N 166°48'30"E||Gardener 1823; 5-6 May 1823|
|19°26'N 166°45'E||Bennett in U.S.Congress 1835|
|19°30'N 167°E||Vandervord 1870 (The Friend 1 April 1871)|
|20°30'E 166°42'E||Lamira; U.S.Congress 1835|
|?N 167°42E||Andrews 1830; 30 April-2 May 1829;|
Although most coordinates vary only little, it needs to be kept in mind that the atoll reportedly can only be seen from 5-10 miles and that at that latitude 10' are equivalent of 9 miles. The variously reported positions of Wake, plotted in figure 1, show that the variability in longitude is quite large. The grey-shaded area indicates the visibility of the atoll from the topgallant mast head of a normal sailing vessel of the day.
Figure 1. The various positions of Wake Atoll as reported in logbooks and the literature plotted against a 5-mile (dark shaded) and 10-mile (light shaded) visibility radius.
A number of whaler's logbooks could be consulted which contain entries referring to Wake:  logbooks of the vessels Foster,  Lima,  Pioneer,  Marengo,  Harvest,  Maria Theresia,  Mentor and Ocean Rover.  One of these whalers describes the atoll also as wooded while two others (Lima and Bellona) actually landed on Wake for "wooding". The entry for 30 April 1829 in the logbook of the Lima contains a very small sketch of Wake, with the annotation "don't forget Wakes Island." 
Given the descriptions of the atoll in the botanical literature  as well as by other whalers  and other vessels  of the late 19th and early 20th century these descriptions appear rather surprising. However, it is quite possible that in the early 19th century Wake Atoll was substantially more heavily vegetated and wooded than today. It can be expected that the environmental balance in such an arid area was rather fragile and could easily be upset by the human impact during the (unsustainable) wood collecting exercises.
Some of the whalers observed that the shallow lagoon contained beche-le-mar, edible holothurians or "sea cucumbers", which could be dried and sold to China.  It seems, however, that unlike other areas of the Pacific the resources on Wake were never exploited. 
However, not everyone of the Vincennes crew was enthralled by the appearance of Wake. Lieutenant James Alden, for example, does not find Wake worth inclusion in his otherwise quite detailed journal. 
Although it has been frequently asserted by various authors  there is no evidence in Wilkes' account or the papers of other members of the expedition that the atoll was formally annexed on behalf of the United States, most likely because of its rather desolate nature. 
|select from the following...|
Digital Micronesia-An Electronic Library & Archive is provided free of charge as an advertising-free information service for the world community. It is being maintained by Dirk HR Spennemann, Associate Professor in Cultural Heritage Management,Institute of Land, Water and Society and School of Environmental & Information Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia. The server space and technical support are provided by Charles Sturt University as part of its commitment to regional engagement. Environmental SciencesInformation Sciences
|Marshall Islands Kosrae CNMI Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Guam Wake Pohnpei FSM Federated States of Micronesia Yap Chuuk Marshall Islands politics public health environment culture WWII history literature XXX Cultural Heritage Management Micronesian Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences CNMI German Colonial Sources Mariana Islands Historic Preservation Spennemann Dirk Spennemann Dirk HR Spennemann Murray Time Louis Becke Jane Downing Downing|